Open Access
Issue
Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.
Volume 97, 2022
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 7
Section Photonics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2022210270
Published online 11 March 2022

© N. Kneip et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2022

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

The genesis of the elements started within the first 3 min after the big bang, when H up to Be was formed. All elements heavier than Be were and still are produced by the various processes of stellar nucleosynthesis. Up to Fe they are synthesized by hydrostatic nuclear fusion in star cores [1]. Elements beyond iron and nickel are formed in various astrophysical scenarios that are not yet fully understood. The occurrence of nuclides with half-lives of the order of 100 ka to 10 Ma in astronomical objects and in some particular locations on the Earth allows to study the origin of matter in the Solar system. 53Mn is one of the proton-rich isotopes in the iron peak region which is supposed to be produced during supernovae explosions. Because of its long half-life in the order of 3.8(4) Ma [2,3], 53Mn is of particular interest of stellar evolution studies. It belongs to a group of about 10 so-called short lived cosmogenic radionuclides with half-lives in the range of 100 ka to 100 Ma, which also include 10Be, 26Al, 41Ca, 60Fe, 129I, 107Pd, 146Sm, 182Hf and 244Pu. All these isotopes were present during the formation of our Solar system. By studying extraterrestrial material or terrestrial archives, highly relevant information can be obtained about the processes within and the composition of the early Solar system [4]. Additionally, small amounts of these isotopes reach the earth in form of the high-energy nuclei component of galactic cosmic rays (HZE ions), as interstellar dust particles from extrasolar sources or are continuously produced by spallation reactions on the Earth surface [5]. Sensitive isotope ratio measurements on primarily the heavier ones of these isotopes, as well as 53Mn, are carried out at specific large scale accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facilities. High acceleration energy of 10 MeV and beyond is required in order to minimize background and achieve sufficient isotopic and isobaric selectivity [6,7]. A broad collection of AMS based measurements on 53Mn abundances are reported. These concern both, extra-terrestrial materials [8] as well as various terrestrial sources, including exposure age dating in surface rocks of Australia or Antarctica [9,10] or deep-sea crusts [11]. Within the latter, the detected 53Mn is clearly identified as supernova remnants on Earth [12]. Alternatively, the occurrence of 53Mn in the earlySolar system is verified via quantification of the excess of its decay product 53Cr in 53Mn/53Cr dating [13]. As pointed out in [14], this 53Mn/53Cr chronometercan well be utilized to accurately date events in the early Solar system. However, such studies require precise data on the 53Mn half-life as well as on its neutron capture cross sections in order to obtain conclusive information on pathways regarding its formation instellar events and its deposition on Earth. Similar as for few others of the short-lived cosmogenic isotopes, these data are not known with acceptable uncertainty and more precise measurements are needed. In the case of 53Mn, the uncertainty of the half-life is 10%. This uncertainty should be reduced to values well below 3% in order to utilize 53Mn for precise dating both of terrestrial and extraterrestrial samples. Due to its extremely low abundance together with its long half-life in the order of Ma and its low energy electron capture decay, no simple decay measurements can be used for the determination of the half-life of 53Mn for obvious reasons. Instead, the half-life can be determined only with, reasonably strong and well quantified 53Mn samples of highest purity, using the fundamental relation: (1)

where denotes the half-life, and N and A the number of atoms and the activity of the radioactive isotope in the given sample, respectively.

In the scope of the foreseen half-life measurements, multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS) will be used for the accurate determination of the number of atoms of 53Mn. A precision of better than 0.5% has been demonstrated [15]. As 53Mn is a pure electron capture (EC) radionuclide, its decay is accompanied only by emission of low-energy secondary Auger electrons and X-rays in the energy range of few keV. This restricts the number of suitable activity measurement techniques considerably; liquid scintillation counting (LSC) is commonly used for the activity quantification of this class of radionuclides and will be utilized during this project as well [16]. Both MC-ICP-MS and LSC have highest requirements on the purity of the sample material. Large excess of isobaric contaminants, most notably of the stable chromium isotope 53Cr, can drastically reduce the precision of the mass spectrometric measurements of 53Mn or render them completely impossible. Furthermore, due to the limited spectrometry capabilities of LSC, all other radioactive contaminants have to be removed from the sample in order to attribute the detected decays to 53Mn exclusively.

One possibility to produce the necessary amounts of 53Mn is to utilize spallation reactions at corresponding accelerator facilities. This involves the preparation and installation of specific targets at accelerator facilities [17]. Amounts in the order of mg of 53Mn, corresponding to about 1019 atoms, were obtained within the ERAWAST initiative from activated beam dump materials at the PSI accelerator complex [17 ; 20 ; 21]. For extracting Mn from the multitude of co-produced long-lived radioisotopes and omnipresent stable isotopes of other elements of the periodic table specific radiochemical separation procedures were worked out at PSI, as described elsewhere [22].

While the bulk of the stable and radioactive impurities in the sample could be removed using conventional chemical separation techniques, this does not apply for the long-lived radioisotope 54Mn () and for stable 55Mn. The amount of 54Mn, which is being co-produced in the spallation processes in a similar quantity as 53Mn, corresponds to an activity surplus of about 7 orders of magnitude at end of theirradiation. After 25 years the 54Mn activity of initially 1019 atoms will be down to about 400 Bq, i.e. less than 1% of the activity of the same amount of 53Mn atoms. As an EC decaying radionuclide of the same chemical element, the radiation of 54Mn overlaps the energy range of 53Mn. As an EC decaying radionuclide of the same chemical element, the accompanying radiation of 54Mn overlaps the one of 53Mn. For a precise LSC measurements with a sample size below 1017 atoms (equivalent to 600 Bq) of 53Mn, an efficient suppression of 54Mn to provide an activity ratio of at least 1000 : 1 (53Mn to 54Mn) is essential. At the same time, a similar amount of 53Mn (i.e. 1017 atoms or about 600 Bq) is needed for reasonable measurement times. As the overall amount of 53Mn available to this experiment is limited to few 1018 atoms 53Mn only, an overall efficiency of about 10% of the mass separation process is mandatory.

Laser mass spectrometry was identified as suitable technique to reach the desired sample purity and ensure optimum process efficiency. Resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS) has proven to be the most universal and for the majority of cases also most efficient method for the generation of ion beams [18]. In addition, it avoids ionization of any elemental or molecular isobaric contaminations, reducing total ion load and space charge disturbance in a subsequent mass separation step to a minimum. The method uses element-selective laser resonance ionization, in combination with a mass selection step at a high transmission isotope separator. Today, primary application of laser resonance ionization is found in the field of highly selective and efficient ionization of exotic, most often short-lived radioisotopes at radioactive ion beam facilities, such as CERN-ISOLDE [19]. The main focus of the work described here is the preparation of a suitable sample for 53Mn half-live measurement at the RISIKO mass separator. This also includes the development and characterization of a suitable ionization scheme.

2 Experimental setup

The RISIKO laser mass separation facility is set up around a 30 keV magnetic sector field mass spectrometer of 60 ° deflection angle and a focal length of 1 m. It is designed for ion beam currents up to 1 μA and provides mass resolving power of . For universal application along the entire chart of nuclides, it implies a specifically designed laser resonance ionization ion source unit [23]. This set up involves a high repetition rate pulsed laser system with two or three tunable Ti:sapphire (Ti:sa) lasers, specifically designed for RIMS, which were developed at the University of Mainz. These lasers have meanwhile found application at numerous on-line and off-line facilities worldwide for ion production as well as for spectroscopy and analytics, as pointed out in [2426], where also the lasers are described in detail. The mass spectrometer set-up used for 53Mn implantation is sketched in Figure 1, while just a brief outline of mass separator and laser system operation conditions and measuring procedure is given below.

Individual samples containing several 1017 atoms of 53Mn dissolved within 20−60 μL of diluted nitric acid were dripped onto 10 × 10 mm2 or 10× 15 mm2 sized, 4 μm Ti carrier foils, dried and calcinated at 220 °C to transforme manganese into the oxide form. The Ti foils were folded to a small envelope for full sample enclosure and afterwards introduced into the reservoir of the laser ion source unit. The latter is a Ta capillary of about 120 mm length with an inner diameter of 1 mm, closed near the hottest spot in the middle by crimping. At the open side it is attached to the rear end of a Ta atomizer/ionizer cavity of 35 mm length and 2.3 mm inner diameter, wherein the laser resonance ionization process takes place. Both, the capillary as well as the cavity, can be heated independently up to temperatures of 2300 K by dc electric currents. These also provide a weak electric field gradient for guiding the generated ions towards the orifice for extraction. By gradually heating the capillary up to the similar maximum temperature as the cavity the fully oxidized MnO2 is dissociated by multiple surface contacts with the Ti. The resulting Mn atoms diffuse steadily into the hot atomizer cavity, which is kept at a temperature of about 2300 K throughout the entire measurement. In this way adsorption of sample material on cold spots and corresponding losses are prevented. Within the atomizer cavity the Mn atoms are ionized, predominantly by the laser radiation, which is entering along the beam path through a window in the magnet. Interfering non-selective ionization processes can occur to a significantly lower extent too, e.g. on the hot ion source surfaces or by collision.

An ion beam of up to 1 μA is extracted by the 30 kV acceleration potential and is well collimated by an einzel lens and a quadrupole lens. After passing the sector field dipole magnet, the separated ion beam passes an adjustable slit which is set to transmit more than 90% of the ions of the selected mass while suppressing neighboring and other masses by at least a factor of 5 × 103 in the mass range of Mn. A post focalization lens downstream was used to focus the beam to a size of 5–10 mm FWHM in the target area, where it is finally accumulated in a Faraday-cup like collector structure. The collection foils of about 50 mm diameter can be placed for ion implantation, while an absolute read-out of the ion beam current is achieved on a sensitive electrometer throughout the implantation process. The measured current is used to control the heating of the sample reservoir and to stabilize the ion beam current on an initially specified value.

The three Ti:sa lasers, required for the excitation ionization process, are pumped by about 12 W pump power each from a pulsed frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser, operating at 532 nm with 10 kHz repetition rate. They can generate tunable laser radiation from 690 nm to 960 nm with an average power up to 4 W. Single pass frequency doubling in a BBO crystal is used to generate the required wavelengths in the blue spectral range. For the preparatory atomic spectroscopy investigations to identify a strong auto-ionizing (AI) state, a specific Ti:sa laser type was used, which was optimized for continuous wavelength tuning along the entire spectral range by installation of a grating as frequency selective element [27].

thumbnail Fig. 1

Experimental setup used for the efficiency measurements using 55Mn and the implantation of 53Mn.

3 Laser resonance ionization of Mn

In the laser resonance ionization process, atoms of the desired element are excited stepwise along strong optical atomic transitions into auto-ionizing states or directly into the ionization continuum by powerful pulsed laser radiation. Due to the uniqueness of the atomic structure of each element, this process is explicitly element-selective while being highly efficient at the same time. On the other hand, laser ionization schemes have to be developed individually for each element and laser type. A steadily increasing number of presently more than 60 elements are accessible by laser resonance ionization, as listed on a specific database hosted at CERN [28].

For efficient and selective ionization of Mn, a dedicated optical excitation scheme was developed, as visualized in Figure 2. In contrast to earlier Mn ionization schemes using either dye [29] or Ti:sa lasers [30], the use of UV radiation was avoided, which is advantageous in matters of simplicity of the laser setup, the available laser power and the prevention of any non-specific background by the high energy UV laser radiation. From the 3d5 4s2 6S5∕2 ground state [31] the strong transition at 403.2 nm into the level at 24 802.25 cm−1 was used as a first excitation step. A second step at 446.2 nm further excites the atoms into the second excited level located at 47 212.06cm−1 [32]. To se-arch for a suitable ionizing transition, the wide-range tunable laser was scanned to access the spectral range from 59 800 cm−1 to 61 500 cm−1 around the ionization potential (IP), located at 59 959.56 cm−1. The full spectrum is given in Figure 2 (top), exhibiting on the left side numerous sharp Rydberg resonances converging towards the IP as well as a rather smooth behaviour above the IP. At an total energy of 60 939.09 cm−1 a significant peak with a resonance enhancement by a factor of five compared to non-resonant ionization was observed, which was identified to correspond to the auto ionizing level, tabulated at 60938.97 cm−1 [32]. This level exhibits a strongly asymmetric profile, described by a Fano profile [33,34], as shown in the inlay of the spectrum of Figure 2, and was chosen for the third excitation step of the ionization scheme. For the two lower excitation steps, line profiles are given for different laser powers in Figure 2 (lower left). The line widths amount to a minimum of 10 GHz for the lowest laser power and can reach maximum values of well beyond 30 GHz for elevated power levels. These significant peak broadenings and the flattening of the peak profiles display strong saturation in both lower excitation steps, in contrary to the third excitation into the AI level, which is far off from saturation even at maximum available laser power of 2 W. A further increase in laser power could correspondingly increase the ionization efficiencies discussed below. Both isotopes 55Mn as well as 53Mn exhibit rather large hyperfine splittings in their resonance lines in the order of 10 GHz, which were studied e.g. by Basar et al. [35] In contrast, the optical isotope shifts are known to be very small with values around a maximum of 0.5 GHz in this region of the nuclear chart. As indicated by the absence of any significant asymmetry in a resonance line, all profiles fully cover the hyperfine structures, which are not resolved at all. Correspondingly, no specific laser tuning for excitation of either 55Mn or 53Mn was necessary and the ionization probability is assumed to be identical for both isotopes.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Details of the optical resonance ionization, lower right: three step excitation scheme, lower left: resonance curves of all three excitation step for different laser powers, top: ionization spectrum by tuning of the third excitation step, showing Rydberg resonances converging towards the ionization potential (red dashed line indicated IP) and the used strong autoionizing level at 60939.09 cm−1 (indicated AI).

4 Characterization of the overall efficiency

Tests on samples with well calibrated amounts of stable manganese (55Mn) with atom numbers in the range of 1014 to 1016 atoms, prepared from an atomic absorption standard solution (Alfa Aesar), were performed with identical sample preparation for characterization of the ion beam production and transport. The efficiency of the Mn implantation is defined as (2)

where Q is the total accumulated charge in the target, N0 the number of sample atoms, Ndet the number of detected atoms and e the elemental charge. Uncertainties in the initial sample size represent one substantial contribution to the efficiency measurement error. They amount to a maximum of about 10% for the test samples with 1014 atoms with slightly lower values of a few %, for 1015 atoms and for 1016 atoms. A second significant uncertainty for the measured efficiency results from imperfections in the ion current measurements at the detector. While sputtered electrons are rather efficiently supressed by a repeller electrode at the Faraday cup detector, also significant ion sputtering occurs at the 30 keV implantation process. The effect is depending on the surface composition of the implantation target, which varies during the measurement but in most cases is leading to too low recorded currents. Characterization studies showed, that the ion current - and in this way the efficiency - is systematically obscured by deviations in the range of -5% up to +20%. Subsequently, the systematic uncertainty is indicated by .

A total of 10 efficiency measurements were performed with different sample sizes and different maximum ion currents. The maximum available laser powers in the range of 25, 150 and 2000 mW were used for the three consecutive excitation steps. Comparable laser settings were used for the implantation runs. After each measurement, a blank Ti sample carrier was heated in the ion source to quantify and verify the Mn traces in the foil and ensured that no significant share of previous measurements remained in the source. In all carrier foils, Mn could be detected. This contribution was ascribed to intrinsic content of the carrier material itself. From these “blank” measurements, an offset for each efficiency measurement was calculated using equation (2). Considering the different sample sizes, this results in a small contribution of -0.3(1)% for samples with 1016 atoms and -6(2)% for 1014 atoms, respectively.

An overview of the results is shown in Table 1, where the offset corrections mentioned are included in the reported efficiencies. Optimal operating conditions for the implantation were found at lower ion currents in the range below 100 nA. Samples containing 1014 atoms were measured ation currents of 10 nA, with a typical measurement duration up to significant signal decline of 30 minutes. The typical total release time was 1.5–2 h. For samples with 1015 atoms, the source was operated at a similar ion current for some hours. The similar duration in the small and medium sample efficiency measurements, despite similar Imax, are due to the circumstance that the ion source was heated very slow and careful, so that the entire measurements were dominated by the long heating phase.

Higher currents well beyond 100 nA were used in the measurements with 1016 atoms to obtain comparable sampling durations. In this setting, a slight decrease in the efficiency was observed, caused by a less efficient reduction process in the ionsource. In addition space charge effects impair the ion beam quality and lead to lower overall transmission through the apparatus. Also, the increased vapor pressure inside the ion source at necessarily raised reservoir temperature leads to a higher release of sample material from the atomizer region into the extraction region and the mass separator, similarly causing possible loss of Mn atoms. The result is the observation of a reduction in the achievable efficiency. Nonetheless, it should be noted that an increase in the ion current by a factor of 50 leads to a loss in efficiency by a factor of about 3, so that high-current operation could still be foreseen for less valuable samples and for implantation of macroscopic amounts.

Table 1

Overview on the efficiency measurements with stable 55Mn using different sample sizes (N0) and maximum ion currents in the range of 10nA to 500 nA. The efficiency was calculated using equation (2). The combined standard uncertainty is calculated based on the uncertainties of the sample preparation as well as the ion detection process. The error in the mean value is the standard deviation in the set of individual measurements.

5 Implantation of 53Mn

In order to reveal possible charged particle contaminations in the ion beam, which may affect the beam quality and the implantation process, the implantation runs were preceded by a mass spectrometric analysis in the full mass range from 20 u to 75 u taken at a typical ion source temperature from more than 1300 °C during implantation. Figure 3 compares two mass spectra, the upper one with resonance ionization on Mn and the lower one with lasers blocked. The latter one shows just unselective ionization of volatile species, e.g., by surface ionization at the hot walls of the ion source which addresses primarily alkaline and alkaline earth elements, delivering beam currents up to 100 nA. Weak contributions of transition metals like Ti and its monoxide, well below 1 nA, are also visible, indicated by its specific isotope pattern. Additional unresolved background structures occurring in the low pA range are ascribed to organic compounds or doubly charged molecules. By introducing resonance ionization, the mass peaks of Mn are increased by about a factor of 105 to ion currents of typically 100 nA. The signal of 53Mn, relevant for the implantation process, exceeds the unspecific background on this mass by a factor of more than 3 × 104. Most conservatively ascribing any background entirely to 53Cr, a suppression of this elemental isobaric interference of at least 4 orders of magnitude to non-relevant amounts is demonstrated. The remaining contribution from the stable isotope 55Mn on the mass of 53Mn amounts to about 1 × 10−4, corresponding to a selectivity one order of magnitude higher than requested, while no measurable amount of 54Mn is observed. As expected, most of the other mass peaks are unaffected by the laser radiation, while just the Ca, Ti (which was introduced as carrier foil) and TiO signals show a slight gain of about a factor of 10, which is either due to the increased heating by the laser radiation or to non-resonant ionization of highly excited atoms, stemming from gas collisions in the hot source environment.

Total Mn atom sample loads in the ion source in all cases remained below 1018 atoms. For the implantation runs, the mass separator was operated with a mean ion current well below 100 nA on the selected mass of 53 u, which corresponds to an overall ion current of about 400 nA at the ion source exit and in front of the magnet. At this level disturbing space charge effects are still reasonably low. Post focalization was used to shape the circular ion beam spot to a size of approximately 7.5 mm at the target stage. This spot was slowly scanned over the predefined circular central collection area of 12 mm diameter. For easy handling the Al-target diameter was 52 mm, being covered outside the active area by an aperture. Figure 4 shows on the left the homogenity of the ion current during the scan over this implantation area as function of the lateral deflection. A photo of the Al foil target after the successful implantation is shown in Figure 4 on the right, where the implanted 53Mn is well visible as central dark spot.

An upper limit for the density of implanted ions on the predefined area of ~180 mm2 is resulting from sputtering losses, which occur due to the bombardment of the incoming 30 keV ions. This value was estimated for Al as well as for Al2 O3 being the most likely expected surface material layers, by the program code TRIDYN [36], which gives maximum achievable atom densities and implantation depth for the process, as shown in Figure 5.

In both materials Al and Al2 O3, about 1 to 1.5 × 1017 atoms can be maximally implanted into the area of ~ 180 mm2 corresponding to the collection spot size. The implantation depth in Al for Mn ions of 30 keV is about 20 nm, which has to be compared to the Al2 O3 surface layer thickness of about 5 nm [37]. Thus, the majority of Mn ions are implanted into the Al bulk material as shown in Figure 5. An upper limit of about 1 × 1017 atoms per target area was respected during the 53Mn implantation runs, which meets the specification of the requested purification and enrichment as discussed in the introduction.

For a conservative safety margin, the total initial sample amount of ~ 1.4 × 1018 atoms of 53Mn was distributed into 6 subsamples. Out of these, 5 samples could be properly purified and implanted; including one test sample of just 1 × 1017 atoms and two times two samples of either 2 × 1017 or 3× 1017 atoms of 53Mn each, respectively. During implantation of a sixth sample a fatal mechanical error occurred at the mass separator implantation stage, which lowered the achievable efficiency down to 2.7%. This run was thus abandoned. Each sample contained a surplus of about a factor of 2 of stable 55Mn, as visible in Figure 3. The five samples no. 1 to no. 5 were used for individual implantation runs, from which the three smaller ones, denominated no. 1 to no. 3, were implanted into a first and the two larger ones, no. 4 and no. 5, into a second Al foil target, T1 and T2, respectively. The individual sample sizes in number of initial 53Mn atoms (N0), durations of implantation run, overall efficiencies achieved for each of the 5 runs are given in Table 2. In all cases, the implanted ion beam current was stabilized at about 100 nA, resulting in acceptable duration of the implantation runs in the order of less than 24 h. In this time frame, suitable operation stability of laser system and mass separator could be guaranteed.

The number of implanted 53Mn atoms into the two Al targets T1 and T2 amounts to and atoms, respectively, i.e., to a total of atoms, which corresponds to an average efficiency of 11.4% for the entire implantation process, significantly lowered by the lost sample. Considering only the 5 successfull runs a value of 14.2% is resulting. Nevertheless, both values very well meet the requested specifications. A precise quantification of the implanted 53Mn amount will be carried out afterwards by MC-ICP-MS as discussed in the introduction.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison of mass spectrum in the range from 20 u to 75 u (upper panel) with and without resonance ionization of Mn (lower panel).

thumbnail Fig. 4

Implantation of 53Mn in Al (T2). Left: view of the accummulated ion current distribution during the implantation Right: Al foil target with central implantation of 53Mn.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Implantation simulation with the program TRIDYN for Mn ions of 30 keV energy. Left: maximum number of implanted atoms for Al and Al2O3 as function of incoming ion number on the implantation area. Right: implantation depths in Al.

Table 2

Individual implantation runs, sample size N0 53Mn atoms, duration, efficiency of implantation and the number of individually implanted 53Mn atoms are given. The implantation efficiency (ϵ) was calculated via equation (2). The efficiency uncertainty was determined in the same way as explained in Section 4.

6 Summary

Resonance ionization mass spectrometry was used for purification and enrichment of the radioisotope 53Mn including direct implantation into Al foil targets, which were applied for subsequent precision measurements of the half-life of the radioactive decay. As preparation a dedicated optical excitation and ionization scheme for Mn was developed and characterized on quantified samples of stable 55Mn. Efficiency measurements were performed on different sample sizes and for different ion beam currents from 10 nA up to 500 nA. An average value of ~23% implantation efficiency was demonstrated for smallest samples of 1014 atoms and a very low ion current of 10 nA. Increasing the sample size to 1015 atoms resulted in a reduced efficiency of 17%, while either higher atoms numbers of 1016 atoms or ion currents up to 500 nA further decreased this value down to 7%.

Further more losses resulting from sputtering processes on the Al targets were estimated by simulations and considered in the measurements. Based on these measurements the implantation of about atoms of 53Mn was successfully carried out. Ion beam currents of 100 nA on mass 53, corresponding to about 400 nA total ion current in front of the separator magnet were used for this process, which resulted in an overall efficiency of 14.2%. The implanted amount of about 1.6 × 1017 atoms corresponding to an activity of about 1 kBq of 53Mn represents a more than sufficient sample size for both, the LSC activity standardization as well as the high precision MC-ICP-MS atom counting. Using the sample material described here, preliminary results of the half-life determination of 53Mn points to anoverall uncertainty of less than 2%, well below the initial goal of 3%. Furthermore, no signal of 54Mn could be observed in the LSC and hpGe gamma spectra, which confirmed the high effectivity of the RIMS separation. A manuscript summarizing the half-life determination is currently in preparation.

Author contribution statement

All the authors were involved in the preparation of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank R. Heinke, P. Naubereit and M. Trümper for their assistance during preparations and/or measurements. The software package TRIDYN, developed by W. Möller, is licensed by Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf e. V., Bautzner Landstr. 400, D-01328 Dresden, Germany, represented by the board of directors.

References

  1. A.M. Boesgaard, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 319 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Wölfle et al., Radiochim. Acta 18, 207 (1972) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Heimann et al., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 38, 217 (1974) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Honda et al., Phys. Rev. C 4, 1182 (1971) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Zinner, Science 300, 265 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Knie et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 172, 806 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Poutivtsev et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 268, 187 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Leya et al., Meteo. Planet. Sci. 55, 818 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L.G. Gladkis et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 259, 178 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.M. Schaefer et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 251, 334 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G.P. Glasby, in Manganese: Predominant Role of Nodules and Crusts (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 371–427 [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Korschinek et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 031101 (2020) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. I.D. Hutcheon et al., Science 282, 1865 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Dressler et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 105201 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Ulrich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. C 102, 024613 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Kossert et al., Appl. Radiat. Isot. 64, 1446 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Schumann et al., EPJ Web Conf. 146, 06019 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. V.N. Fedoseev et al., Phys. Scr. 85 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. V.N. Fedoseev et al., J. Phys. G 44 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Schumann et al., Radiochim. Acta 97, 123 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Schumann et al., J. Phys. B: Nucl. Part. 35 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Ayranov et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 286, 649 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Kieck et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 053304 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Rothe et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 312, 052020 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Geppert et al., Nucl. Phys. A 746, 47 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Grüning et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 235 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Teigelhöfer et al., Hyperfine Interact. 196 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. available: https://riliselements.web.cern.ch/ (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. V.N. Fedoseev et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 126 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. Liu et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 48, 205205 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Sugar et al., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, 177 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Kramida, et al., NIST Atomic Spectra Database available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd (2021) [Google Scholar]
  33. U. Fano et al., Phys. Rev. 137, A1364 (1965) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Ueda et al., Phys. Rev. A 35, 4602 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  35. G. Basar et al., Phys. Scr. 67, 476 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. W. Moeller et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2, 814 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. B.R. Strohmeier et al., Surf. Interface Anal. 15, 51 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: N. Kneip, D. Studer, T. Kieck, J. Ulrich, R. Dressler, D. Schumann and K. Wendt, Separation of manganese isotopes by resonance ionization mass spectrometry for 53Mn half-life determination, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 19 (2022)

All Tables

Table 1

Overview on the efficiency measurements with stable 55Mn using different sample sizes (N0) and maximum ion currents in the range of 10nA to 500 nA. The efficiency was calculated using equation (2). The combined standard uncertainty is calculated based on the uncertainties of the sample preparation as well as the ion detection process. The error in the mean value is the standard deviation in the set of individual measurements.

Table 2

Individual implantation runs, sample size N0 53Mn atoms, duration, efficiency of implantation and the number of individually implanted 53Mn atoms are given. The implantation efficiency (ϵ) was calculated via equation (2). The efficiency uncertainty was determined in the same way as explained in Section 4.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Experimental setup used for the efficiency measurements using 55Mn and the implantation of 53Mn.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Details of the optical resonance ionization, lower right: three step excitation scheme, lower left: resonance curves of all three excitation step for different laser powers, top: ionization spectrum by tuning of the third excitation step, showing Rydberg resonances converging towards the ionization potential (red dashed line indicated IP) and the used strong autoionizing level at 60939.09 cm−1 (indicated AI).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Comparison of mass spectrum in the range from 20 u to 75 u (upper panel) with and without resonance ionization of Mn (lower panel).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Implantation of 53Mn in Al (T2). Left: view of the accummulated ion current distribution during the implantation Right: Al foil target with central implantation of 53Mn.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Implantation simulation with the program TRIDYN for Mn ions of 30 keV energy. Left: maximum number of implanted atoms for Al and Al2O3 as function of incoming ion number on the implantation area. Right: implantation depths in Al.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.