Issue
Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.
Volume 100, 2025
Special Issue on ‘Imaging, Diffraction, and Spectroscopy on the micro/nanoscale (EMC 2024)’, edited by Jakob Birkedal Wagner and Randi Holmestad
Article Number 23
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2025019
Published online 21 August 2025
  1. F.M. Ross, Opportunities and challenges in liquid cell electron microscopy, Science 350.6267, aaa9886 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Ayache et al., in Sample Preparation Hand-Book for Transmission Electron Microscopy: Techniques, (Springer Science & Business Media, 2010), Vol. 2 [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Michen et al., Avoiding drying-artifacts in transmission electron microscopy: Characterizing the size and colloidal state of nanoparticles, Sci. Rep. 5, 9793 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Gusnard, R.H. Kirschner, Cell and organelle shrinkage during preparation for scanning electron microscopy: effects of fixation, dehydration and critical point drying, J. Microsc. 110, 51 (1977) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Schmidli et al., Miniaturized sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy, J. Vis. Exp.: Jove 137, 57310 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Wu et al., Liquid-phase electron microscopy for soft matter science and biology, Adv. Mater. 32, 2001582 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Li et al., An unusual type of polymorphism in a liquid crystal, Nat. Commun. 9, 714 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. E.S. Grape et al., Breathing metal-organic framework based on flexible inorganic building units, Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 320 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Jensen, A. Burrows, K. Mølhave, Monolithic chip system with a microfluidic channel for in situ electron microscopy of liquids, Microsc. Microanal. 20, 445 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. M.N. Yesibolati et al., Electron inelastic mean free path in water, Nanoscale 12, 20649 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. N. de Jonge et al., Resolution and Aberration Correction in Liquid Cell Transmission Electron Microscopy, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0071-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Kothleitner et al., Linking tem analytical spectroscopies for an assumptionless compositional analysis, Microsc. Microanal. 20, 678 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2007.907627 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Lagana et al., Quasi-nanofluidic liquid cell for in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy, in European Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings, Wiley Online Library, 2016, pp. 402–403 [Google Scholar]
  14. Q. Zhang, K. Poolla, C.J. Spanos, Across wafer critical dimension uniformity enhancement through lithography and etch process sequence: Concept, approach, modeling, and experiment, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 20, 488 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. M.S. Larsen, Charges and potentials in liquid phase transmission electron microscopy, Ph.D. thesis, 2024 [Google Scholar]
  16. J.K. Mathiesen et al., Chemical Insights into the Formation of Colloidal Iridium Nanoparticles from In Situ X-ray Total Scattering: Influence of Precursors and Cations on the Reaction Pathway, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 1769 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Quinson et al., Solvent-dependent growth and stabilization mechanisms of surfactant-free colloidal Pt nanoparticles, Chem. Eur. J. 26, 9012 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Lettenmeier et al., Highly active nanosized iridium catalysts: synthesis and operando spectroscopy in a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, Chem. Sci. 9, 3570 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. T.S. Rodrigues et al., Synthesis of colloidal metal nanocrystals: A comprehensive review on the reductants, Chem. Eur. J. 24, 16944 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Andoulsi, K. Horchani-Naifer, M. Férid, Effect of the preparation route on the structure and microstructure of LaCoO3, Chem. Pap. 68, 608 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Guinier, X-ray diffraction in crystals, in Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies. Dorer, 1963 [Google Scholar]
  22. T.L. Christiansen, S.R. Cooper, K.M.Ø. Jensen, There's no place like realspace: elucidating size-dependent atomic structure of nanomaterials using pair distribution function analysis, Nanoscale Adv. 2, 2234 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Umesaki, N. Hirosaki, K. Hirao, Structural characterization of amorphous silicon nitride by molecular dynamics simulation, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 150, 120 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  24. M.B. De Kock et al., Determining the radial distribution function of water using electron scattering: A key to solution phase chemistry, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 194504 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Klint, G. Karlsson, J.-O. Bovin, Cryo-TEM Snapshots of Ferritin Adsorbed on Small Zeolite Crystals, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 2560 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Houben et al., A mechanism of ferritin crystallization revealed by cryo-STEM tomography, Nature 579, 540 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Dhaoui et al., 3D Visualization of Proteins within Metal-Organic Frameworks via Ferritin- Enabled Electron Microscopy, Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2312972 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  28. M.N. Yesibolati et al., Unhindered Brownian Motion of Individual Nanoparticles in Liquid-Phase Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, Nano Lett. 20, 7108 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. Th.E. Weirich et al., Rietveld analysis of electron powder diffraction data from nanocrystalline anatase, TiO2, Ultramicroscopy 81, 263 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  30. T.E. Gorelik et al., Towards quantitative treatment of electron pair distribution function, Acta Crystallogr. Sect., B: Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 75, 532 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  31. S.J.L. Billinge, The rise of the X-ray atomic pair distribution function method: a series of for-tunate events, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 377, 20180413 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  32. E.P. George, D. Raabe, R.O. Ritchie, High-entropy alloys, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 515 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. J.C. Rao et al., Secondary phases in AlxCoCr-FeNi high-entropy alloys: An in-situ TEM heating study and thermodynamic appraisal, Acta Mater. 131, 206 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  34. X.D. Xu et al., Transmission electron microscopy characterization of dislocation structure in a face-centered cubic high-entropy alloy Al0. 1CoCrFeNi, Acta Mater. 144, 107 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  35. R.D. Sommer, How to grow crystals for X-ray crystallography, Cryst. Struct. Commun. 80, 337 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Liu, K. Chen, D. Xue, How to fast grow large-size crystals? Innovation 4, 100458 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  37. K.H. Nam, Real-time monitoring of large-scale crystal growth using batch crystallization for serial crystallography, J. Cryst. Growth 614, 127219 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  38. L.B. McCusker, Electron diffraction and the hydrogen atom, Science 355, 136 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. Z. Huang et al., 3D electron diffraction as an important technique for structure elucidation of metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks, Coord. Chem. Rev. 427, 213583 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  40. Z. Huang, T. Willhammar, X. Zou, Three-dimensional electron diffraction for porous crystalline materials: structural determination and beyond, Chem. Sci. 12, 1206 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  41. Y. Luo et al., Atomic-scale insights into topotactic transformations in an extra-large-pore zeolite using time-resolved 3D electron diffraction, Nat. Synth. 4, 453 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  42. B. Altenburger et al., Label-Free Imaging of Catalytic H2O2 Decomposition on Single Colloidal Pt Nanoparticles Using Nanofluidic Scattering Microscopy, ACS Nano 17, 21030 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Levin et al., A nanofluidic device for parallel single nanoparticle catalysis in solution, Nat. Commun. 10, 4426 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Wu et al., Understanding, Mimicking, and Mitigating Radiolytic Damage to Polymers in Liquid Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy, Adv. Mater. 36, 2402987 (2024) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.