Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.
Volume 91, Number 2, August 2020
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Section||Physics of Energy Transfer, Conversion and Storage|
|Published online||06 August 2020|
Analysis of vector hysteresis models in comparison to anhysteretic magnetization model
Institute of Electrical Machines (IEM), RWTH Aachen University,
52062 Aachen, Germany
* e-mail: email@example.com
Received in final form: 24 May 2020
Accepted: 23 June 2020
Published online: 6 August 2020
The design of electrical machines and magnetic actuators requires accurate models to represent hysteresis effects in ferromagnetic materials. The magnetic nonlinearity of the iron core is usually considered by an anhysteretic magnetization curve. With this assumption, hysteresis’ effects in the field computation are completely neglected. This paper presents a comparative study of different hysteresis models, particularly Pragmatic Algebraic Model (PAM) and vector stop model, with regard to a vector anhysteretic anisotropic model. The PAM turns out to be an efficient model implemented with one mathematical equation. The multi cells stop model relies on a consistent thermodynamic formulation, whose dissipation corresponds to a dry friction-like element. Both models implement a constitutive relationship, in which the magnetic flux density vector as independent input and magnetic field strength as output. With a rotational single sheet tester (RSST), various tests for a sample of material FeSi24-50A (FeSi) with a silicon proportion of 2.4 wt% can be proceeded under the application of relevant field distribution. The obtained measured data are applied to parameterize and validate the models. Following numerical experiments the results are compared with those obtained by means of an anhysteretic anisotropic model.
© X. Xiao et al., EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.