Issue |
Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys.
Volume 55, Number 1, July 2011
Focus on Hakone XII
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 13802 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2010100439 | |
Published online | 21 July 2011 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2010100439
Comparison of the ozone generation efficiency by two different discharge modes of dielectric barrier discharge
1
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
2
Office of Industry-University Collaboration, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 7-1 Ohgigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 9218501, Japan
a e-mail:
n.osawa@neptune.kanazawa-it.ac.jp
Received:
1
November
2010
Revised:
4
December
2010
Accepted:
10
December
2010
Published online:
21
July
2011
The Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) is composed of many Filamentary Discharges (FDs), and it can be applied to ozone generation, gaseous pollution control, etc. In our laboratory, we investigated efficient cleaning methods of diesel exhaust gas by DBD. From the results of numerical simulation of chemical reactions, a homogeneous DBD was expected to improve the efficiency of pollution control and also the ozone yield. Recently, we found that a DBD device using alumina as barrier material can generate an Atmospheric Pressure Townsend Discharge (APTD) in air. In this research, we setup two ozonizers with different discharge modes of FD and APTD, and compared the ozone yield. The experimental results showed that the ozone yield was higher by the FD mode than by the APTD mode in lower Specific Input Energy (SIE) region. However in the region that the SIE is larger than 420J/L, the APTD mode showed higher ozone yield than FD mode.
© EDP Sciences, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.